Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3399
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuccione, Lisa-
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Krista-
dc.contributor.authorMileshkin, Linda-
dc.contributor.authorTothill, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorBowtell, David-
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, Stephen-
dc.contributor.authorDeFazio, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorKarapetis, Chris S.-
dc.contributor.authorWilcken, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Madhu-
dc.contributor.authorSteer, Christopher-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Bo-
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Ian M.-
dc.contributor.authorKaranth, Narayan-
dc.contributor.authorBryant, Cindy-
dc.contributor.authorSchofield, Penelope-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T04:56:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-17T04:56:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3399-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the healthcare experiences, quality of life, and psychosocial needs of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) early after diagnosis; comparing their experiences to patients with advanced cancer of a known primary (non-CUP control patients) and published general population reference data where available. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional, multi-site study comparing CUP patients (n = 139) compared to non-CUP controls (n = 45). Demographic, clinical information and patient-reported outcome questionnaire data were collected at baseline. RESULTS: Differences in healthcare experienced were found between CUP and non-CUP controls with CUP patients reporting higher scores for unmet medical communication/information needs compared with non-CUP control patients (p = 0.013) as well as greater uncertainty in illness (p = 0.042). Whilst no differences were found between CUP and non-CUP controls on the EORTC and PROMIS measures, of those that 'received written information about your cancer...' and asked '...how useful was it?' fewer CUP patients reported finding the information useful 40% vs 61%, and more were likely to not have received written information at all 59% vs 32%; (p = 0.002). Additionally, of those that found information about their cancer online, fewer patients with CUP reported finding it useful 32% vs 48% control patients (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CUP patients have unmet medical communication/information needs and greater uncertainty in illness but do not differ in health-related quality of life domains compared to patients with advanced cancer of a known primary.-
dc.relation.isversionof20220709-
dc.subjectCross-sectional Study-
dc.subjectHealth Services Needs and Demand-
dc.subjectHuman-
dc.subjectPsychology-
dc.subjectQuality of Life-
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires-
dc.subjectUncertainty-
dc.subjectCup-
dc.subjectCancer-
dc.subjectCancer-
dc.subjectOncology-
dc.subjectQuality of Life-
dc.subjectSupportive Care-
dc.titleUncertainty and the unmet informational needs of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP): a cross-sectional multi-site study-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleSupportive Care in Cancer-
dc.accession.number35804177-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35804177-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512714/pdf/520_2022_Article_7228.pdf-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia. Lisa.Guccione@petermac.org.-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Lisa.Guccione@petermac.org.-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationSwinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationWestmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationFlinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationFlinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationBarwon Health, Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Geelong, VIC, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationBorder Medical Oncology, Albury Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre, Albury, NSW, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationBendigo Health, Regional Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationSouthWest Healthcare, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationTop End Health Service, Darwin, NT, Australia.-
dc.format.startpage8217-8229-
dc.source.volume30-
local.issue.number10-
dc.identifier.databaseMedline-
dc.identifier.noteseng-
dc.identifier.notesTRP13062/Victorian Cancer Agency-
dc.identifier.notes1082604/Cancer Australia-
dc.identifier.notes1048193/Cancer Australia-
dc.identifier.notesGermany-
dc.identifier.notes2022/07/09-
dc.identifier.notesSupport Care Cancer. 2022 Oct;30(10):8217-8229. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07228-7. Epub 2022 Jul 9.-
dc.identifier.importdoi10.1007/s00520-022-07228-7-
dc.identifier.dateOct-
dc.identifier.dateNLM-
dc.contributor.swhauthorCollins, Ian M.-
Appears in Collections:SWH Staff Publications



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing