Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3433
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKeogh, L. A.-
dc.contributor.authorSteel, E.-
dc.contributor.authorWeideman, P.-
dc.contributor.authorButow, P.-
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Ian M.-
dc.contributor.authorEmery, J. D.-
dc.contributor.authorMann, G. B.-
dc.contributor.authorBickerstaffe, A.-
dc.contributor.authorTrainer, A. H.-
dc.contributor.authorHopper, L. J.-
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, K. A.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T04:56:59Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-17T04:56:59Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3433-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Personalised prevention of breast cancer has focused on women at very high risk, yet most breast cancers occur in women at average, or moderately increased risk (</=moderate risk). OBJECTIVES: To determine; 1) interest of women at</=moderate risk (consumers) in personalised information about breast cancer risk; 2) familial cancer clinicians' (FCCs) perspective on managing women at</=moderate risk, and; 3) both consumers' and FCCs reactions to iPrevent, a personalised breast cancer risk assessment and risk management decision support tool. METHODS: Seven focus groups on breast cancer risk were conducted with 49 participants; 27 consumers and 22 FCCs. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Consumers reported some misconceptions, low trust in primary care practitioners for breast cancer prevention advice and frustration that they often lacked tailored advice about breast cancer risk. They expressed interest in receiving personalised risk information using iPrevent. FCCs reported an inadequate workforce to advise women at</=moderate risk and reacted positively to the potential of iPrevent to assist. CONCLUSIONS: While highlighting a potential role for iPrevent, several outstanding issues remain. For personalised prevention of breast cancer to extend beyond women at high risk, we must harness women's interest in receiving tailored information about breast cancer prevention and identify a workforce willing to advise women.-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectAlgorithms-
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnel-
dc.subjectAttitude to Health-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms-
dc.subjectDecision Support-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectFocus Groups-
dc.subjectGenetic Counseling-
dc.subjectHealth Personnel-
dc.subjectHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome-
dc.subjectHuman-
dc.subjectInternet-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectOncologist-
dc.subjectPhysicians-
dc.subjectRisk Assessment-
dc.subjectYoung Adult-
dc.subjectBreast Cancer Prevention-
dc.subjectClinician Perspectives-
dc.subjectConsumer Perspectives-
dc.subjectOnline Risk Assessment-
dc.subjectRisk Management-
dc.subjectPrimary Care-
dc.titleConsumer and clinician perspectives on personalising breast cancer prevention information-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleBreast-
dc.accession.number30445378-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30445378-
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: l.keogh@unimelb.edu.au.-
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making (CeMPED) and the Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; The Greater Green Triangle Clinical School, Deakin University School of Medicine, Warrnambool, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationThe Breast Service, Royal Melbourne and Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.-
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.-
dc.format.startpage39-47-
dc.source.volume43-
dc.identifier.noteseng-
dc.identifier.notesNetherlands-
dc.identifier.notes2018/11/18-
dc.identifier.notesBreast. 2019 Feb;43:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 7.-
dc.identifier.importdoi10.1016/j.breast.2018.11.002-
dc.identifier.dateFeb-
dc.contributor.swhauthorCollins, Ian M.-
Appears in Collections:SWH Staff Publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing