Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3557
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, Shu Fen-
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorDunning, Trisha Lynette-
dc.contributor.authorAshley, David Michael-
dc.contributor.authorKhasraw, Mustafa-
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Theresa Margaret-
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Ian M.-
dc.contributor.authorLorgelly, Paula Kate-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T04:57:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-17T04:57:30Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3557-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: This study sought to understand the preferences of patients with cancer and the trade-offs between appointment attributes using discrete choice experiment (DCE). METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Patients with cancer at 3 hospitals completed a self-administered DCE. Each scenario described 6 attributes: expertise of health care professionals (HCPs), familiarity of doctors with patients' medical history, waiting time, accompaniment by family/friends, travel time, and out-of-pocket costs. Patient preferences were estimated using logistic regression. Willingness to pay (WTP) estimates were derived from regression coefficients. RESULTS: Of 512 patients contacted, 185 returned the questionnaire. The mean age was 61 years, and 60% of respondents were female. The mean time since cancer diagnosis was 34 months, 90% had received treatment; and 61% had early-stage disease. The most important attributes were expertise and familiarity of doctors with patients' medical history; distance traveled was least likely to influence patient preferences. The WTP analysis estimated that patients were willing to pay $680 (95% CI, 470-891) for an appointment with a specialist, $571 (95% CI, 388-754) for doctors familiar with their history, $422 (95% CI, 262-582) for shorter waiting times, $399 (95% CI, 249-549) to be accompanied by family/friends, and $301 (95% CI, 162-441) for shorter traveling times. Male patients had a stronger preference for accompaniment by family/friends. The expertise of HCP was the most important attribute for patients regardless of geographic remoteness. CONCLUSIONS: Our study can assist the development of patient-centered health care models that improve patient access to experienced HCPs, support the role of primary care providers during the cancer journey, and educate patients about the roles of non-oncology HCPs to cope with increasing demand for cancer care.-
dc.subjectOncology-
dc.subjectExperiment-
dc.subjectAppointments-
dc.titleA discrete choice experiment to examine the preferences of patients with cancer and their willingness to pay for different types of health care appointments-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://jnccn.org/downloadpdf/journals/jnccn/14/3/article-p311.pdf-
dc.format.startpage311-319-
dc.source.volume14-
local.issue.number3-
dc.contributor.swhauthorHayes, Theresa M.-
dc.contributor.swhauthorCollins, Ian M.-
Appears in Collections:SWH Staff Publications



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing