Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3815
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, Terry-
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Chris-
dc.contributor.authorAtkin, Leanne-
dc.contributor.authorHurlow, Jenny-
dc.contributor.authorVega de Ceniga, Melina-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T05:33:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-12T05:33:56Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn2052-2916en
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3815-
dc.description.abstractObjective: In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has resulted in changes to caseload management, access to training and education, and other additional pressures, a survey was developed to understand current awareness and implementation of the wound hygiene concept into practice one year on from its dissemination. Barriers to implementation and outcomes were also surveyed. Method: The 26-question survey, a mixture of multiple choice and free-text, was developed by the Journal of Wound Care projects team, in consultation with ConvaTec, and distributed globally via email and online; the survey was open for just over 12 weeks. Due to the exploratory nature of the research, non-probability sampling was used. The authors reviewed the outputs of the survey to draw conclusions from the data, with the support of a medical writer. Results: There were 1478 respondents who agreed to the use of their anonymised aggregated data. Nearly 90% were from the US or UK, and the majority worked in wound care specialist roles, equally distributed between community and acute care settings; 66.6% had been in wound care for more than 8 years. The respondents work across the spectrum of wound types. More than half (57.4%) had heard of the concept of wound hygiene, of whom 75.3% have implemented it; 78.7% answered that they 'always' apply wound hygiene and 20.8% 'sometimes' do so. The top three barriers to adoption were confidence (39.0%), the desire for more research (25.7%) and competence (24.8%). Overall, following implementation of wound hygiene, 80.3% reported that their patients' healing rates had improved. Conclusion: Respondents strongly agreed that implementing wound hygiene is a successful approach for biofilm management and a critical component for improving wound healing rates in hard-to-heal wounds. However, the barriers to its uptake and implementation demonstrate that comprehensive education and training, institutional support for policy and protocol changes, and more clinical research are needed to support wound hygiene. Keywords: biofilm; global survey; hard-to-heal wounds; implementation; wound hygiene.en
dc.subjectWound Hygieneen
dc.subjectWound Careen
dc.subjectSurveyen
dc.subjectBarriersen
dc.subjectCaseload Managementen
dc.titleWound hygiene survey: awareness, implementation, barriers and outcomesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Wound Careen
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.30.7.582en
dc.description.affiliation1The Ottawa Hospital Limb Preservation Centre, Ottawa, Canada. 2Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Huddersfield, UK. 3Advanced Wound Care, Southaven, Mississippi and West Memphis, Arkansas, US. 4Wound Management, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia. 5Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Bizkaia, Spain.en
dc.format.startpage582en
dc.source.volume30en
local.issue.number7en
dc.format.pages582-590en
dc.identifier.importdoi10.12968/jowc.2021.30.7.582en
dc.identifier.date2021-07-
dc.contributor.swhauthorSwanson, Terry-
dc.relation.departmentWound Care-
Appears in Collections:SWH Staff Publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing