Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3878
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPu, Dai-
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Victoria-
dc.contributor.authorGreenstock, Louise-
dc.contributor.authorPigott, Cathie-
dc.contributor.authorPeeters, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorSanci, Lena-
dc.contributor.authorMichele, Callisaya-
dc.contributor.authorBrowning, Colette-
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Wendy-
dc.contributor.authorHaines, Terry-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-17T04:09:05Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-17T04:09:05Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-23-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3878-
dc.description.abstractThere has been increasing adoption and implementation of virtual healthcare in recent years, especially with COVID-19 impacting the world. As a result, virtual care initiatives may not undergo stringent quality control processes to ensure that they are appropriate to their context and meet sector needs. The two objectives of this study were to identify virtual care initiatives for older adults currently in use in Victoria and virtual care challenges that could be prioritised for further investigation and scale-up and to understand why certain virtual care initiatives and challenges are prioritised over others for investigation and scale-up. Methods: This project used an Emerging Design approach. A survey of public health services in the state of Victoria in Australia was first carried out, followed by the co-production of research and healthcare priorities with key stakeholders in the areas of primary care, hospital care, consumer representation, research, and government. The survey was used to gather existing virtual care initiatives for older adults and any associated challenges. Co-production processes consisted of individual ratings of initiatives and group-based discussions to identify priority virtual care initiatives and challenges to be addressed for future scale-up. Stakeholders nominated their top three virtual initiatives following discussions. Results: Telehealth was nominated as the highest priority initiative type for scaling up, with virtual emergency department models of care nominated as the highest priority within this category. Remote monitoring was voted as a top priority for further investigations. The top virtual care challenge was data sharing across services and settings, and the user-friendliness of virtual care platforms was nominated as the top priority for further investigation. Conclusions: Stakeholders prioritised public health virtual care initiatives that are easy to adopt and address needs that are perceived to be more immediate (acute more so than chronic care). Virtual care initiatives that incorporate more technology and integrated elements are valued, but more information is needed to inform their potential scale-up.en
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectCommunity-based Participatory Researchen
dc.subjectHealthcare Quality Assuranceen
dc.subjectShared Decision Makingen
dc.subjectTelemedicineen
dc.titleIdentifying public healthcare priorities in virtual care for older adults: A participatory research studyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthen
dc.accession.numberPMID: 36901031en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia. Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia. Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. Western Alliance Academic Health Science Centre, Warrnambool, VIC 3280, Australia. Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC 3125, Australia. Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia. Menzies Institute for Medical Research, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia. Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia. Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.en
dc.source.volume20en
local.issue.number5en
dc.format.pages4015en
dc.identifier.importdoihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054015en
dc.contributor.swhauthorGreenstock, Louise-
Appears in Collections:SWH Staff Publications



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing