Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/4241
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMills, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorNeerhut, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorMcLeod, Kathryn-
dc.contributor.authorWillder, Stuart-
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorGrills, Richard-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-24T23:33:22Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-24T23:33:22Z-
dc.date.issued2025-02-25-
dc.identifier.issnPrint 1445-1433en
dc.identifier.issnOnline 1445-2197en
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/4241-
dc.description.abstractBackground The COVID-19 pandemic facilitated the rapid uptake of telehealth Australia wide. To date, no studies have analysed patient perceptions of a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemic. With over 10 years of experience delivering telehealth to Southwest Victoria, we aim to highlight the benefits, limitations and progress of a regional urological telehealth service. Methods Regional patients living within Western Victoria who participated in our 2017 survey and continued their urological telehealth consultations throughout 2021–2023 were invited to participate in our 2023 survey. Questions were both short answer and multiple choice. Seventy-eight patients met inclusion criteria, and 42 responses were returned. Data analysis utilized a mixed methods approach. Results Overall patient perceptions were favourable in 2017 and improved throughout the Pandemic. The greatest improvements were seen within the performance areas: overall satisfaction, technological aspects, comprehension and financial benefits. Following the pandemic, the distance patients were prepared to travel for face-to-face reviews decreased and preferences for telehealth compared to face-to-face consultations increased by almost 20%. However thematic analysis revealed loss of personalized care, technological faults, fixed beliefs and unsuitable appointments as limitations of this model of care. Conclusion Patients' perspectives of a regional urological telehealth service were overwhelmingly positive highlighting the vital place of urological telehealth in the delivery of equitable urological healthcare to a regional population. Overall, post COVID-19 there were improved patient perceptions of a telehealth service and its role in providing regional patients with the provision of timely, supportive and high-quality urological care.en
dc.publisherRural Surgeryen
dc.subjectTelehealthen
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectUrologyen
dc.subjectPandemicen
dc.subjectSurveyen
dc.titleTelehealth after lockdown: evaluating a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemicen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.publisher.placeAustralasiaen
dc.identifier.journaltitleANZ Journal of Surgeryen
dc.accession.number10.1111/ans.19419en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.19419en
dc.identifier.databaseWileyen
dc.identifier.importdoi10.1111/ans.19419en
dc.contributor.swhauthorMills, Alexander-
dc.relation.departmentUrology-
Appears in Collections:SWH Staff Publications



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing