Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3499
Journal Title: Accuracy of Risk Estimates from the iPrevent Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Management Tool
Authors: Phillips, Kelly-Anne
Liao, Yuyan
Milne, Roger L.
MacInnis, Robert, J.
Collins, Ian M.
Buchsbaum, Richard
Weideman, Prue C.
Bickerstaffe, Adrian
Nesci, Stephanie
Chung, Wendy K.
Southey, Melissa C.
Knight, Julia A.
Whittemore, Alice S.
Dite, Gillian S.
Goldgar, David
Giles, Graham G.
Glendon, Gord
Cuzick, Jack
Antoniou, Antonis C.
Andrulis, Irene L.
John, Esther M.
Daly, Mary B.
Buys, Saundra S.
Hopper, John L.
Terry, Mary Beth
Investigators, kConFab
SWH Author: Collins, Ian M.
Keywords: Cancer
Oncology
iPrevent Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Management Tool
Issue Date: 2019
Date Accessioned: 2023-03-17T04:57:15Z
Date Available: 2023-03-17T04:57:15Z
Accession Number: 31853515
Url: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853515
Format Startpage: 66
Source Volume: 3
Issue Number: 4
Notes: eng
UL1 TR001863/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/
England
DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkz066
Date: Dec
Abstract: BACKGROUND: iPrevent is an online breast cancer (BC) risk management decision support tool. It uses an internal switching algorithm, based on a woman's risk factor data, to estimate her absolute BC risk using either the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS) version 7.02, or Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm version 3 models, and then provides tailored risk management information. This study assessed the accuracy of the 10-year risk estimates using prospective data. METHODS: iPrevent-assigned 10-year invasive BC risk was calculated for 15 732 women aged 20-70 years and without BC at recruitment to the Prospective Family Study Cohort. Calibration, the ratio of the expected (E) number of BCs to the observed (O) number and discriminatory accuracy were assessed. RESULTS: During the 10 years of follow-up, 619 women (3.9%) developed BC compared with 702 expected (E/O = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.05 to 1.23). For women younger than 50 years, 50 years and older, and BRCA1/2-mutation carriers and noncarriers, E/O was 1.04 (95% CI = 0.93 to 1.16), 1.24 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.39), 1.13 (95% CI = 0.96 to 1.34), and 1.13 (95% CI = 1.04 to 1.24), respectively. The C-statistic was 0.70 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.73) overall and 0.74 (95% CI = 0.71 to 0.77), 0.63 (95% CI = 0.59 to 0.66), 0.59 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.64), and 0.65 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.68), respectively, for the subgroups above. Applying the newer IBIS version 8.0b in the iPrevent switching algorithm improved calibration overall (E/O = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.15) and in all subgroups, without changing discriminatory accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: For 10-year BC risk, iPrevent had good discriminatory accuracy overall and was well calibrated for women aged younger than 50 years. Calibration may be improved in the future by incorporating IBIS version 8.0b.
URI: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/3499
Journal Title: JNCI Cancer Spectrum
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:SWH Staff Publications



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing