Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/4385
Journal Title: Circulating tumor DNA-guided adjuvant therapy in locally advanced colon cancer: the randomized phase 2/3 DYNAMIC-III trial
Authors: Tie, Jeanne
Wang, Yuxuan
Loree, Jonathan M.
Cohen, Joshua D.
Wong, Rachel
Price, Timothy
Tebbutt, Niall C.
Gebski, Val
Espinoza, David
Burge, Matthew
Harris, Sam
Lynam, James
Lee, Belinda
Lee, Margaret M.
Breadner, Daniel
Debrincat, Marlyse
Foroughi, Siavash
Chantrill, Lorraine
Lim, Stephanie H.
Gill, Sharlene
O'Callaghan, Chris
Ptak, Janine
Silliman, Natalie
Dobbyn, Lisa
AGITG DYNAMIC-III Study Group
SWH Author: Hayes, Theresa
Keywords: DNA
Tumor
Tumour
Colon Cancer
Cancer
Trial
Oncology
ctDNA
Issue Date: 26-Sep-2025
Date Accessioned: 2026-03-16T23:23:05Z
Date Available: 2026-03-16T23:23:05Z
Accession Number: ACTRN12617001566325
Url: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-04030-w
Format Startpage: 4291-4300
Source Volume: 31
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-025-04030-w
Abstract: Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer provides uncertain benefit at the individual level. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may help refine risk-adjusted treatment selection. In this multicenter, randomized, phase 2/3 trial, patients with stage III colon cancer underwent ctDNA testing 5–6 weeks after surgery and were assigned (1:1) to ctDNA-guided or standard management. In the ctDNA-guided arm, patients negative for ctDNA received de-escalated therapy, whereas ctDNA-positive patients received escalated therapy. Clinicians prespecified the standard regimen. Primary endpoints were 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for ctDNA-negative patients and 2-year RFS for ctDNA-positive patients. Secondary endpoints included treatment-related hospitalization and ctDNA clearance. Among 968 evaluable patients, 702 (72.5%) were ctDNA negative. With a median follow-up of 47 months, ctDNA-negative patients experienced significantly fewer recurrences than ctDNA-positive patients (3-year RFS 87% versus 49%; P < 0.001). In ctDNA-negative patients, de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin use (34.8% versus 88.6%) and hospitalizations (8.5% versus 13.2%) but yielded slightly lower RFS than standard management (85.3% versus 88.1%), not meeting the non-inferiority margin. In ctDNA-positive patients, higher ctDNA burden correlated with recurrence risk (3-year RFS 77% to 23% across quartiles; P < 0.001). Escalated therapy did not improve outcomes over standard management (2-year RFS 51% versus 61%). There was no unexpected toxicity. Persistent ctDNA after treatment predicted markedly worse prognosis (3-year RFS 14% versus 79%). ctDNA is validated as a strong prognostic classifier. ctDNA-guided de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin exposure and adverse events with outcomes approaching standard of care, whereas exploratory chemotherapy intensification conferred no RFS benefit, suggesting a need for novel strategies in ctDNA-positive disease. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12617001566325.
URI: https://repository.southwesthealthcare.com.au/swhealthcarejspui/handle/1/4385
Journal Title: Nature Medicine
ISSN: 1546-170X (online)
1078-8956 (print)
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:SWH Data Contributions

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing